Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A New Outdoor Learning Geodesic Dome School Design

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 3 - 8, 30.06.2022

Elif Esin Bakır Bahattin Aydınlı

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to ensure that out-of-school learning environments for a sustainable environmental education in our world, which is under the threat of global warming, are started to be implemented in science and mathematics disciplines as of pre-school period, apart from primary, secondary and high school levels. The procedures for obtaining permission for school managers and teachers, high operating costs, seen as dangerous and a waste of time for parents are the problems of reaching out-of-school learning environments. In order to eliminate these problems, a school model was designed, which is located in the school garden, with an architecture in the form of an atomic model and included workshops created as a geodesic dome.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Science and mathematics out-of-school geodesic dome workshops.

Kaynakça

  • Akilli M., Seven S. (2014). “The effect of 3D computer models on academic achievement and spatial animation: Atom models” (Turkish Journal of Education).
  • Atar B. (2017). “The Journey of Our Food Wheat from the Past to the Future” (Süleyman Demirel University Yalvaç Academy Journal 2 (1) : 1-12, 2017).
  • Ateş, A. (2009). Landing vehicles to the sky: Planetariums. NTV Science, 7, 106-115.
  • Balkan Kıyıcı, F. & Atabek Yiğit, E. (2010). Science education beyond the classroom: A field trip to wind power plant. (International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1), 225-243.)
  • Bakioglu, B. & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2014). Outdoor science education: Technical visit to a dialysis center, (Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 3(2), 15-26.)
  • Baxter, JM & Preece, PFW (2000). A comparison of dome and computer planetaria in the teaching of astronomy. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), (63-69.)
  • Bishop, J.E. (2003). Pre-college astronomy education in the United States in the twentieth century. In Heck A. (Eds), Information Handling in Astronomy – Historical Vistas (pp.207-231.)
  • Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International (Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.)
  • Carrier, SJ (2009).The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachersself-efficacy. (Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 35-48.)
  • Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bozdogan, AE (2007). The place and importance of science and technology museums in science teaching. (PhD thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara).
  • Ertaş, H., Şen, A.İ., andparmaksızoğlu, A. (2011). The effect of out-of-school scientific activities on the level of associating energy with daily life of 9th grade students. (Necatibey Education Faculty Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-198.)
  • Erten Z., Taşçi G.(2016) “Developing Out-of-School Learning Environments Activities for Science Lesson and Evaluation of the Effects of Students on Scientific Process Skills” (Erzincan University Journal of Education Vol - Issue: 18 - 2 Year: 2016).
  • Gursoy G. (2018). “Out-of-school Learning Environments in Science Teaching” (Turkish Studies Educational Sciences).
  • Kubat U. (2018). “The Opinions of Science Teacher Candidates About Out-of-School Learning Environments (Mehmet Akif University Journal of Education Faculty).
  • Odabaş E, Günbey B.(2020) “The Silkworm’s Journey in the World and Anatolia” (Journal of Animal Sciences and Products).
  • Saraç H. (2017). “ Research on Out-of-School Learning Environments in Turkey : Content Analysis Study. (Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research).
  • Sever R, Yalçınkaya E. (2018) .Environmental Education. Pegem Academy (Page 166).
  • Sontay, G & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2017). An Investigation of Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Travel Organizing. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education. 32(4): 863-879.
  • Sontay, G., Tutar, M. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Student Views on Out-of-School Learning Environments and Science Teaching: Planetarium Trip. (Journal of Research in InformalEnvironments (JRINEN), 1(1), 1-24.)
  • Sonmez, V. & Alacapınar, FG (2011). Illustrated scientific research methods. Ankara: Memoir Publishing.
  • Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. November, 5, 2021, from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Hayvancilik/Ipek-Bocekciligi
  • Türkiye Tohumcular Birliği. Retrived November, 6, 2021, from https://turktob.org.tr/tr/topraksiz-tarim/8760
  • Tznisli, D. (2013). Preservice primary school mathematics teachers’ questioning skills and knowledge of students in terms of pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Science, 38(2), 1-18.
  • Uludag G. (2017). “The Effect of Using Out-of-School Learning Environments in Science Education on Preschool Children’s Scientific Process Skills” (Hacettepe University Primary Education Department, Pre-School Education Department Doctoral Thesis).

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 3 - 8, 30.06.2022

Elif Esin Bakır Bahattin Aydınlı

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akilli M., Seven S. (2014). “The effect of 3D computer models on academic achievement and spatial animation: Atom models” (Turkish Journal of Education).
  • Atar B. (2017). “The Journey of Our Food Wheat from the Past to the Future” (Süleyman Demirel University Yalvaç Academy Journal 2 (1) : 1-12, 2017).
  • Ateş, A. (2009). Landing vehicles to the sky: Planetariums. NTV Science, 7, 106-115.
  • Balkan Kıyıcı, F. & Atabek Yiğit, E. (2010). Science education beyond the classroom: A field trip to wind power plant. (International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1), 225-243.)
  • Bakioglu, B. & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2014). Outdoor science education: Technical visit to a dialysis center, (Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 3(2), 15-26.)
  • Baxter, JM & Preece, PFW (2000). A comparison of dome and computer planetaria in the teaching of astronomy. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), (63-69.)
  • Bishop, J.E. (2003). Pre-college astronomy education in the United States in the twentieth century. In Heck A. (Eds), Information Handling in Astronomy – Historical Vistas (pp.207-231.)
  • Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International (Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.)
  • Carrier, SJ (2009).The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachersself-efficacy. (Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 35-48.)
  • Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bozdogan, AE (2007). The place and importance of science and technology museums in science teaching. (PhD thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara).
  • Ertaş, H., Şen, A.İ., andparmaksızoğlu, A. (2011). The effect of out-of-school scientific activities on the level of associating energy with daily life of 9th grade students. (Necatibey Education Faculty Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-198.)
  • Erten Z., Taşçi G.(2016) “Developing Out-of-School Learning Environments Activities for Science Lesson and Evaluation of the Effects of Students on Scientific Process Skills” (Erzincan University Journal of Education Vol - Issue: 18 - 2 Year: 2016).
  • Gursoy G. (2018). “Out-of-school Learning Environments in Science Teaching” (Turkish Studies Educational Sciences).
  • Kubat U. (2018). “The Opinions of Science Teacher Candidates About Out-of-School Learning Environments (Mehmet Akif University Journal of Education Faculty).
  • Odabaş E, Günbey B.(2020) “The Silkworm’s Journey in the World and Anatolia” (Journal of Animal Sciences and Products).
  • Saraç H. (2017). “ Research on Out-of-School Learning Environments in Turkey : Content Analysis Study. (Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research).
  • Sever R, Yalçınkaya E. (2018) .Environmental Education. Pegem Academy (Page 166).
  • Sontay, G & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2017). An Investigation of Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Travel Organizing. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education. 32(4): 863-879.
  • Sontay, G., Tutar, M. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Student Views on Out-of-School Learning Environments and Science Teaching: Planetarium Trip. (Journal of Research in InformalEnvironments (JRINEN), 1(1), 1-24.)
  • Sonmez, V. & Alacapınar, FG (2011). Illustrated scientific research methods. Ankara: Memoir Publishing.
  • Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. November, 5, 2021, from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Hayvancilik/Ipek-Bocekciligi
  • Türkiye Tohumcular Birliği. Retrived November, 6, 2021, from https://turktob.org.tr/tr/topraksiz-tarim/8760
  • Tznisli, D. (2013). Preservice primary school mathematics teachers’ questioning skills and knowledge of students in terms of pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Science, 38(2), 1-18.
  • Uludag G. (2017). “The Effect of Using Out-of-School Learning Environments in Science Education on Preschool Children’s Scientific Process Skills” (Hacettepe University Primary Education Department, Pre-School Education Department Doctoral Thesis).
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Elif Esin Bakır 0000-0003-3186-7435

Bahattin Aydınlı 0000-0002-6525-4162

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Aralık 2021
Kabul Tarihi 17 Şubat 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Bakır, E. E., & Aydınlı, B. (2022). A New Outdoor Learning Geodesic Dome School Design. Social Scientific Centered Issues, 4(1), 3-8.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.


20077

Eurasian Scientific Journal Index

17629

Türk Eğitim İndeksi

17630

Asos Index

17631

Google Scholar