Kilitbahir

Öz

Ancient Arabic poetry is one of the references that language scholars apply to when determining a rule related to the Arabic language. It is also a fact that there are uses that are contrary to the rules established in some verses. This has led to different assessments of the idiosyncrasy of poetry by language scholars. As a matter of fact, some people say that such uses are a necessity for poets due to factors such as vezin, rhyme, harmony and poetry tune; some language polished have suggested that these uses are appropriate for Arabic language and dialects. a word that does not comply with the syntactic and morphological pedestals, although it is considered illegal, is considered worthless by linguists and is not pushed to one side. On the contrary, we have been thinking about it, it has been divided into several parts regarding whether it conforms to the basic principles of syntax and morphological science, and some parts have been considered important in understanding the science of syntax. The uses that contradict the rules of language in ancient Arabic poetry show the peculiar situation of the poem. These uses, which are considered to be illegal, are considered under the phenomenon of necessity. Since the process of formation of the rules of language, the phenomenon of necessity has attracted the attention of nahivists, literati and critics and has been directly and indirectly included in many classical works that are considered muteber. Considering the nature of poetry, some imperatives that are not in prose, such as vezin and rhyme, oblige the poet to resort to necessity. Necessities have been taxied in several ways within themselves. In this study, which will address morphological necessities, the approaches of nahivists to these uses will be examined with a critical method